Is Obama Mentally Unfit for Office?
May 17 at 9:09am by Macranger
Despite Obama’s, and his enabling minions, the fact is that he owns the appeasement label - he earned it. It wasn’t George Bush who said he would sit down with Iran without preconditions, it was Obama during a Presidential debate. But even more unsettling is the realization that the Democratic Party’s choice for President might be a few fries short of a happy meal.
First to an article today fromMark Steyn.
“President Bush was in Israel the other day and gave a speech to the Knesset. Its perspective was summed up by his closing anecdote – a departing British officer in May 1948 handing the iron bar to the Zion Gate to a trembling rabbi and telling him it was the first time in 18 centuries that a key to the gates of the Jerusalem was in the hands of a Jew. In other words, it was a big-picture speech, referencing the Holocaust, the pogroms, Masada – and the challenges that lie ahead. Sen. Obama was not mentioned in the text. No Democrat was mentioned, save for President Truman, in the context of his recognition of the new state of Israel when it was a mere 11 minutes old.
Nonetheless, Barack Obama decided that the president’s speech was really about him, and he didn’t care for it. He didn’t put it quite as bluntly as he did with the Rev. Wright, but the message was the same: “That’s enough. That’s a show of disrespect to me.” And, taking their cue from the soon-to-be nominee’s weirdly petty narcissism, Nancy Pelosi, John Kerry, Joe Biden and Co. piled on to deplore Bush’s outrageous, unacceptable, unpresidential, outrageously unacceptable and unacceptably unpresidential behavior.
Honestly. What a bunch of self-absorbed ninnies. Here’s what the president said:
“Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along. We have heard this foolish delusion before. As Nazi tanks crossed into Poland in 1939, an American senator declared: ‘Lord, if I could only have talked to Hitler, all this might have been avoided.’ We have an obligation to call this what it is – the false comfort of appeasement, which has been repeatedly discredited by history.”
It says something for Democrat touchiness that the minute a guy makes a generalized observation about folks who appease terrorists and dictators the Dems assume: Hey, they’re talking about me. Actually, he wasn’t – or, to be more precise, he wasn’t talking onlyabout you.”
Psychologically speaking, and yes I have some education in that Barack Obama is the classic narcissist. I for one find it to be severe based on observing his behavior over the primary season. To define “severe”:
“In psychology and psychiatry, excessive narcissism is recognized as a severe personality dysfunction or personality disorder, most characteristically Narcissistic personality disorder.” - Wiki.
Narcissists are also known for their ability to lie, although they don’t see it that way. In this respect Obama’s defensiveness and especially paranoia is marked.
In fact a friend of mine who is a police psychologist examined a few of Obama’s videos and appearances where he was defending himself and we both saw the classic symptoms showed by suspects when they lie. To be specific we know that when a person is lying they will become extremely defensive, refusing to answer any questions and even accusing you of lying, meaning they have something to hide.
Of course there is nothing wrong with defending oneself against an attack, but in Obama’s case you notice it’s never about the specific charges against him, it’s always about the attacker - his “persecutor”. It’s about deflection. It’s like the kid who gets caught in the cookie jar by Mom only to complain about what his sister is doing.
Remember this?
Ok, the guy’s a ass, but re-look the video over and you can see what happens when the “persecution” is close and up front. It shows Obama rattles quite easily and without much provocation, another classic symptom.
But it really goes beyond even this.
By now you are familiar with this video where Obama talks about disarming America across the board.
Back in March CNS reported on this video citing analysts who described it “bizarre”.
“In an interview with Cybercast News Service, Baker Spring, a national security research fellow at the conservative Heritage Foundation, described Obama as “somebody who’s a mouthpiece for arms control advocacy groups that probably put this litany of commitments in front of him, and he more or less read them without thinking.”
Spring said Obama’s proposed cuts in missile defense spending would be “a profoundly destabilizing decision [which] basically says that any state - or, for that matter, non-state actor - that wants to attack the United States, he gets the free first shot, including with weapons of mass destruction.”
Regarding Obama’s promise to reform the QDR process, Spring said, “Obviously, necessary and unnecessary is, to some degree, in the eye of the beholder. I don’t think that any administration would put out a Quadrennial Defense Review that would explicitly endorse unnecessary programs.
“In a sense, Sen. Obama is, in his comment, is so logically contradictory, that he is saying that he is going to take preemptive action to prevent his own administration, assuming he’s elected, from issuing a report in terms of the future U.S. defense structure, that would include unnecessary and wasteful programs,” said Spring. “It strikes me as a little bizarre, to put it mildly.”
It’s more than bizarre, it’s scary and quite frankly dangerous talk coming from any candidate for President.
Yet in a way it explains the “outrage” of Obama. For even while it’s clear that Bush wasn’t referring to Obama, like I said in this post it simply hit to close to home.
Since I posted the video on this site back in March it has been viewed more than 100,000 times. Mostly by people who flood my email box with outrage that a supposed leader of our country would even speak of such diarment in a critical time of war against radical Islam. But there it is for all the world to see.
Again, all of this points to the fact that Obama isn’t what he seems and there are a lot of people trying to help the real truth of Obama not get out. President Bush didn’t reference him in his speech, but he didn’t have to. It’s as close as anyone has gotten to reveal the truth of this Obama. Again Steyn:
“President Reagan talked with the Soviets while pushing ahead with the deployment of Cruise and Pershing missiles in Europe. He spoke softly – after getting himself a bigger stick. Sen. Obama is proposing to reward a man who pledges to wipe Israel off the map with a presidential photo-op to which he will bring not even a twig. No wonder he’s so twitchy about it.”
Indeed. Of course none of this is concrete proof that Obama is unstable, but there is enough evidence to warrant further investigation.
Bush’s Genius - He baited, Obama bit
May 16 at 1:01pm by Macranger
Just a note on the messiah outrage over President Bush’s reference to the appeasement policy of the left.
I remember during my Army days, when I lived in the barracks. One day when I returned to the laundry room to find out my clothes (underwear and all) were missing from the dryer. I had of course left them there, hoping to retrieve them after they were done.
The next formation we had I walked out to the group and announced to all.
“To the goat-smelling, SOB, whose mama didn’t raise him right, THANKS for stealing my underwear! By the way, I have bugs!!”
Immediately a fellow soldier came up to me, mad as hell and said, “Who’s mama didn’t raise him right?”
I had my man.
Nothing hits a guilty man more than a veiled suggestion of his true intent.
Newt Gingrich on Hannity and Colmes.
Heh….
Obama doesn’t know clap?
May 16 at 1:01pm by Macranger
More lies….
Sounds like clapping to me.
Now back to your waffles.
Obama IS unfit to defend America
May 15 at 5:05pm by Macranger
Lefties in a flutter, they’re Messiah was exposed.
“On a conference call with conservative bloggers this afternoon, John McCain launched what may be his most direct attack yet on Barack Obama’s national security credentials, saying flat out that Obama is incapable of protecting America and lacks the necessary traits to keep it secure from foreign threats.
In a reference to Obama’s declared willingness to meet with the leader of Iran, McCain said:
“I think [it] is an unacceptable position, and shows that Senator Obama does not have the knowledge, the experience, the background to make the kind of judgments that are necessary to preserve this nation’s security.”
That seems like an unequivocal declaration that Obama is incapable of protecting this country. In the past, McCain has raised doubts about Obama’s national security cred, but to our knowledge has never taken the step of declaring outright that he’s unfit to defend the country.”
Posted it before, here it is again.
We have found the Kryptonite to this false Superman, let’s keep driving it home. Obama must not become president of the United States.
