All the buzz about “The Eleven” Republicans that had a sit down with President Bush over the war in Iraq:

“Moderate Republicans gave President Bush a blunt warning on his Iraq policy at a private White House meeting this week, telling the president that conditions needed to improve markedly by fall or more Republicans would desert him on the war.

The White House session demonstrated the grave unease many Republicans are feeling about the war, even as they continue to stand with the president against Democratic efforts to force a withdrawal of forces through a spending measure that has been a flash point for weeks.

Participants in the Tuesday meeting between Mr. Bush, senior administration officials and 11 members of a moderate bloc of House Republicans said the lawmakers were unusually candid with the president, telling him that public support for the war was crumbling in their swing districts.

One told Mr. Bush that voters back home favored a withdrawal even if it meant the war was judged a loss. Representative Tom Davis told Mr. Bush that the president’s approval rating was at 5 percent in one section of his northern Virginia district.

“It was a tough meeting in terms of people being as frank as they possibly could about their districts and their feelings about where the American people are on the war,” said Representative Ray LaHood of Illinois, who took part in the session, which lasted more than an hour in the residential section of the White House. “It was a no-holds-barred meeting.”

Several of the Republican moderates who visited the White House have already come under political attack at home for their support of Mr. Bush and survived serious Democratic challenges in November.

Representative Charles W. Dent of Pennsylvania, a co-chairman of the Tuesday Group, an alliance of about 30 moderate Republican lawmakers, helped arrange the meeting. He said lawmakers wanted to convey the frustration and impatience with the war they are hearing from voters. “We had a very frank conversation about the situation in Iraq,” he said. Even so, the Republicans who attended the White House session indicated that they would maintain solidarity with Mr. Bush for now by opposing the latest Democratic proposal for two-stage financing of war, which is scheduled for a vote on Thursday in the House.

Lawmakers said Mr. Bush made no commitments, but seemed grateful for their support and said a precipitous withdrawal from Iraq could cause the sort of chaos that occurred in Southeast Asia after Americans left Vietnam. The lawmakers said that Mr. Bush and others at the meeting — including Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, the political adviser Karl Rove and National Security Adviser Stephen J. Hadley — appeared to appreciate the political reality facing Republicans who will be on the ballot next year.

‚ÄúIt was very healthy,‚Äù said Representative John A. Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader, who attended but let the moderates do most of the talking.”

First, let’s be clear. Moderates = Rinos, Ok? We’re not talking died in the wool conservatives here. Nevertheless this meeting is significant from the standpoint that we need their votes - and confidence - to stay the course in Iraq. Of course the governement in Iraq isn’t doing us any favors by talking about going on two-week recessess. VP Cheney’s visit was specifically to quell that it was “not helpful”.

Still much of this wouldn’t have been necessary if the White House would pull out all the stops on keeping the public informed of the specific progress made in Iraq. At this partiucular juncture the American people want to know that there is an end in sight for our involvement, whether that be one year or ten. But as I’ve said in the past many times our PR in the White House is abysmal. Faced with the onslaught of the antiwar left and their mouthpieces in the MSM the White House should be well ahead of the false reporting and misleading information that comes from them.

Additionally, Iraqis appear to want us out as Capt Ed notes at Heading Right, yet I’m skeptical on the veracity of this vote considering the infiltration of the assembly by detractors.

Still as we get closer to 2008 we quickly coming to a pinical of decision about the war and our future involvement in the area. Let’s not forget Iran and the very real possibility that we will be involved in some form of conflict within the next 12-18 months. Remember that our presence in the region at this time is critical to keeping the check on Iran so far as acceleration of their proliferation programs, thus my skepticism on the Muqtada al-Sadr fostered vote.